Baltimore City Council
File #: 23-0185R    Version: 0 Name: Reproductive Options for Everyone
Type: City Council Resolution Status: In Committee
File created: 8/21/2023 In control: Health, Environment, and Technology
On agenda: Final action:
Enactment #:
Title: Reproductive Options for Everyone For the purpose of calling on all units of City government receiving City funds to safeguard an individual’s right to abortion care by, unless otherwise required by Maryland or federal law, refraining from using City funds to store, catalogue, provide, monitor, or collect certain information that could be used to retaliate against an individual seeking abortion care.
Sponsors: Phylicia Porter, Odette Ramos, Sharon Green Middleton, Zeke Cohen, Kristerfer Burnett, Danielle N. McCray, John T. Bullock, Mark Conway, Robert Stokes, Sr., Antonio Glover, President Nicholas J. Mosby, James Torrence, Eric T. Costello
Indexes: Everyone Counts, Reproductive Health
Attachments: 1. 23-0185R~1st Reader, 2. BCHD 23-0185R, 3. 23-0185R- Law, 4. PPM Statement on Balt. City Reproductive Options for Everyone (Karen Nelson), 5. Final Synopsis 23-0185R, 6. Hearing Notes 23-0185R 11 29 23
* Warning: This is an unofficial, introductory copy of the bill.
The official copy considered by the City Council is the first reader copy.
Introductory*

City of Baltimore
Council Bill R
(Resolution)

Introduced by: Councilmember Porter



A Resolution Entitled

A Council Resolution concerning
title
Reproductive Options for Everyone
For the purpose of calling on all units of City government receiving City funds to safeguard an individual’s right to abortion care by, unless otherwise required by Maryland or federal law, refraining from using City funds to store, catalogue, provide, monitor, or collect certain information that could be used to retaliate against an individual seeking abortion care.
body

Recitals

Whereas, the City Council of Baltimore City recognizes that reproductive rights are human rights and strongly support the right of pregnant persons to bodily autonomy and control over their medical decisions, as well as their right to privacy with regard to those decisions.

Whereas, the 2022 decision by the United States Supreme Court to overturn the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade has threatened these rights and several states have subsequently passed legislation impeding a pregnant person’s right to bodily autonomy by severely restricting or outright banning an individual’s right to seek abortion care.

Whereas, some state legislatures have demonstrated an intent to punish individuals who cross state lines to seek abortion care, including Idaho, which enacted a law penalizing individuals who assist a minor in seeking out-of-state abortion care.

Whereas, these laws have a detrimental effect on the health and welfare of pregnant pe...

Click here for full text