Supplementary State Fund Operating Appropriation – Baltimore City
Sheriff’s Office – $100,000
FOR the purpose of providing a Supplementary State Fund Operating
Appropriation in the amount of $100,000 to the Baltimore City Sheriff’s
Office – Service 882 (Deputy Sheriff Enforcement), to provide funding for
the establishment of the Neighborhood Services Unit to improve
neighborhood safety and cohesion by addressing persistent public
nuisances and environmental factors that contribute to crime; and providing
for a special effective date.
City Council President (Administration)
Sponsors:
A motion was made by Gray that this Ordinance be Recommended Favorably.
The motion carried by the following vote:
4 - McCray, Schleifer, Gray, and Glover
Yes:
Supplementary State Fund Operating Appropriation – Baltimore City
Sheriff’s Office – $74,667
FOR the purpose of providing a Supplementary State Fund Operating
Appropriation in the amount of $74,667 to the Baltimore City Sheriff’s
Office – Service 882 (Deputy Sheriff Enforcement), to provide funding for
the establishment, modification, enforcement, and recovery of child support
payments from noncustodial parents of children; and providing for a special
effective date.
City Council President (Administration)
Sponsors:
A motion was made by Gray that this Ordinance be Recommended Favorably.
The motion carried by the following vote:
4 - McCray, Schleifer, Gray, and Glover
Yes:
Supplementary Special Revenue Fund Operating Appropriation –
Baltimore City Sheriff’s Office – $612,096
FOR the purpose of providing a Supplementary Special Revenue Fund
Operating Appropriation in the amount of $612,096 to the Baltimore City
Sheriff’s Office – Service 882 (Deputy Sheriff Enforcement), to provide
funding for a wide range of law enforcement needs, including
investigations, training, facilities, equipment, travel, and operational costs,
as well as awards, memorials, and prevention programs such as drug or
gang education; and providing for a special effective date.
City Council President (Administration)
Sponsors:
A motion was made by Schleifer that this Ordinance be Recommended
Favorably with Amendment. The motion carried by the following vote:
4 - McCray, Schleifer, Gray, and Glover
Yes: