Baltimore City Council
File #: 05-0295    Version: 0 Name: Drug-Related Activities - Curfew on Retail Establishments
Type: Ordinance Status: Failed - End of Term
File created: 12/5/2005 In control: City Council
On agenda: Final action: 12/5/2007
Enactment #:
Title: Drug-Related Activities - Curfew on Retail Establishments FOR the purpose of authorizing the imposition of a police curfew on certain retail business establishments under certain circumstances; providing for notice and the opportunity for a hearing; authorizing aggrieved persons to seek judicial and appellate review; imposing certain penalties; and generally relating to the imposition of curfews on retail establishments that are a focal point for persons engaged in drug-related activities.
Sponsors: Mary Pat Clarke
Indexes: Curfew, Drugs
Attachments: 1. 295-1st Reader.pdf

EXPLANATION: CAPITALS indicate matter added to existing law.

[Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.

 

                     * WARNING: THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL, INTRODUCTORY COPY OF THE BILL.

                     THE OFFICIAL COPY CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IS THE FIRST READER COPY.

                     INTRODUCTORY*

 

                     CITY OF BALTIMORE

                     COUNCIL BILL          

                                                                                                                                                           

Introduced by:  Councilmember Clarke                                                                                             

 

                     A BILL ENTITLED

 

AN ORDINANCE concerning

Title

Drug-Related Activities - Curfew on Retail Establishments

 

FOR the purpose of authorizing the imposition of a police curfew on certain retail business establishments under certain circumstances; providing for notice and the opportunity for a hearing; authorizing aggrieved persons to seek judicial and appellate review; imposing certain penalties; and generally relating to the imposition of curfews on retail establishments that are a focal point for persons engaged in drug-related activities.

Body

BY adding

Article 19 - Police Ordinances

Section(s) 18-1 through 18-10, to be under the new subtitle,

"Subtitle 18.  Drugs: Curfew on Retail Establishments"

Baltimore City Code

(Edition 2000)

 

SECTION 1.  BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, That the Laws of Baltimore City read as follows:

 

                     Baltimore City Code

 

                     Article 19.  Police Ordinances

 

                     SUBTITLE 18.  DRUGS: CURFEW ON RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS

 

§ 18-1.  PETITION FOR CURFEW.

 

A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OR THE LOCAL POLICE DISTRICT COMMANDER MAY PETITION THE POLICE COMMISSIONER TO IMPOSE A CURFEW ON RETAIL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS THAT:

 

(1)                     ARE LOCATED WITHIN A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AREA OR WITHIN 1 BLOCK OF AN ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR A RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENT; AND

 

 

                                          (2)                     ARE A FOCAL POINT FOR THE LOITERING OR GATHERING OF PERSONS WHO HAVE THE INTENT TO ENGAGE IN UNLAWFUL DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY.

 

§ 18-2.  IMPOSITION OF CURFEW.

 

(A)  IN GENERAL.

 

ON VERIFICATION THAT THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN § 18-1 OF THIS SUBTITLE EXIST, THE POLICE COMMISSIONER MAY IMPOSE A CURFEW ON THESE RETAIL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS.

 

(B)  DURATION.

 

THE CURFEW MAY BE FOR UP TO 6 HOURS A DAY FOR A PERIOD OF NOT MORE THAN 120 CONTINUOUS DAYS DURING A 6-MONTH PERIOD.

 

(C)  HOURS.

 

THE HOURS OF THE CURFEW MAY BE DAYTIME OR NIGHTTIME, BASED ON THE HOURS DURING WHICH DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY IS MOST PREVALENT.

 

§ 18-3.  NOTICE TO AFFECTED BUSINESSES.

 

AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE A CURFEW IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN, THE POLICE COMMISSIONER SHALL NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED RETAIL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS OF THE INTENTION TO IMPOSE THE CURFEW.

 

§ 18-4.  PETITION FOR EXEMPTION; HEARING.

 

(A)  IN GENERAL.

 

AT LEAST 15 DAYS BEFORE THE CURFEW PERIOD BEGINS, THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A RETAIL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT MAY:

 

(1)                     PETITION THE POLICE COMMISSIONER FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE CURFEW; AND

 

(2)                     REQUEST A HEARING ON THE PETITION BEFORE THE POLICE COMMISSIONER OR THE POLICE COMMISSIONER'S DESIGNEE.

 

(B)  INVESTIGATION.

 

TO HELP EVALUATE AN ESTABLISHMENT'S PETITION FOR EXEMPTION, THE COMMISSIONER MAY CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS USED BY THE PETITIONER TO DISCOURAGE THE USE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT AS A FOCAL POINT FOR THE LOITERING OR GATHERING OF PERSONS WHO HAVE THE INTENT TO ENGAGE IN UNLAWFUL DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY.

 

(C)  GRANT OF EXEMPTION.

 

THE POLICE COMMISSIONER MAY GRANT THE EXEMPTION IF THE COMMISSIONER DETERMINES THAT:

 

 

(1)                      THE PETITIONER IS PROVIDING ADEQUATE SECURITY TO DETER UNLAWFUL DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY; OR

 

(2)                     THE ESTABLISHMENT IN FACT IS NOT A FOCAL POINT FOR THE LOITERING OR GATHERING OF PERSONS WHO HAVE THE INTENT TO ENGAGE IN UNLAWFUL DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY.

 

§ 18-5.  {RESERVED}

 

§ 18-6.  RULES AND REGULATIONS.

 

(A)  COMMISSIONER MAY ADOPT.

 

THE POLICE COMMISSIONER MAY ADOPT RULES AND REGULATIONS TO CARRY OUT THIS SUBTITLE.

 

(B)  FILING WITH LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE.

 

A COPY OF ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS MUST BE FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BEFORE THEY TAKE EFFECT.

 

§ 18-7.  {RESERVED}

 

§ 18-8.  JUDICIAL AND APPELLATE REVIEW.

 

(A)  JUDICIAL REVIEW.

 

A PARTY AGGRIEVED BY A FINAL DECISION OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONER UNDER THIS SUBTITLE MAY SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THAT DECISION BY PETITION TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE.                     

 

(B)  APPELLATE REVIEW.

 

A PARTY TO THE JUDICIAL REVIEW MAY APPEAL THE COURT'S FINAL JUDGMENT TO THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE.

 

§ 18-9.  {RESERVED}

 

§ 18-10.  PENALTIES.

 

ANY OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A RETAIL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT WHO KNOWINGLY VIOLATES A CURFEW IMPOSED UNDER THIS SUBTITLE IS GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND, ON CONVICTION, IS SUBJECT TO A FINE OF NOT MORE $1,000 OR IMPRISONMENT FOR NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS OR BOTH FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR EACH OFFENSE.

 

SECTION 2.  AND BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, That the catchlines contained in this Ordinance are not law and may not be considered to have been enacted as a part of this or any prior Ordinance.

 

SECTION 3.  AND BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, That this Ordinance takes effect on the 30th day after the date it is enacted.

 

dlr05-607~intro/30Nov05

art19/BusnsCrfw/aa:me

 

 

dlr05-607~intro/30Nov05

- 3 -

art19/BusnsCrfw/aa:me