Baltimore City Council
File #: 08-0218    Version: 0 Name: Building Permit Fees - Demolition
Type: Ordinance Status: Enacted
File created: 10/27/2008 In control: City Council
On agenda: Final action: 4/7/2009
Enactment #: 09-156
Title: Building Permit Fees - Demolition FOR the purpose of reinstating a maximum permit fee for demolition work.
Sponsors: City Council President (Administration)
Indexes: Building Permit, Demolition, Fees
Attachments: 1. 08-0218 - 1st Reader.pdf, 2. HCD - 08-0218.pdf, 3. Finance - 08-0218.pdf, 4. Law - 08-0218.pdf, 5. 08-0218 - 3rd Reader.pdf
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS indicate matter added to existing law.
[Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.

* WARNING: THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL, INTRODUCTORY COPY OF THE BILL.
THE OFFICIAL COPY CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IS THE FIRST READER COPY.
INTRODUCTORY*

CITY OF BALTIMORE
COUNCIL BILL

Introduced by: The Council President
At the request of: The Administration (Housing and Community Development)
A BILL ENTITLED

AN ORDINANCE concerning
Title
Building Permit Fees - Demolition

FOR the purpose of reinstating a maximum permit fee for demolition work.
Body
BY repealing and reordaining, with amendments
Article - Building, Fire, and Related Codes
Section(s) 2-103 (BC § 108.6.1k)
Baltimore City Revised Code
(Edition 2000)

SECTION 1. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, That the Laws of Baltimore City read as follows:

Baltimore City Revised Code

Article – Building, Fire, and Related Codes

Part II. International Building Code

§ 2-103. City modifications.

The additions, deletions, amendments, and other modifications adopted by the City are as follows:

Chapter 1. Administration

Section 108 Fees

108.6 Fee schedules.

108.6.1 Permit fees for construction work


k. Demolition.

1 and 2family dwellings $0.030 per cubic
foot volume of structure

Minimum $300

All others $0.075 per cubic
foot volume of structure

Minimum $600

Accessory structures $50 each

MAXIMUM $5,000 PER STRUCTURE


SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, That the catchlines contained in this Ordinance are not law and may not be considered to have been enacted as a p...

Click here for full text