Baltimore City Council
File #: 09-0105R    Version: 0 Name: Informational Hearing - Baltimore Police Commissioner - Policy Change
Type: City Council Resolution Status: Withdrawn
File created: 1/26/2009 In control: City Council
On agenda: Final action: 1/11/2010
Enactment #:
Title: Informational Hearing - Baltimore Police Commissioner - Policy Change FOR the purpose of requesting the Baltimore Police Commissioner to brief the City Council on the change in policy that dictates that the names of police officers who kill or injure citizens will no longer be disclosed to the general public.
Sponsors: President Young, Helen L. Holton, Bill Henry, James B. Kraft, Sharon Green Middleton, Edward Reisinger, Agnes Welch, Mary Pat Clarke, Warren Branch, Belinda Conaway, Stephanie President Rawlings-Blake
Indexes: Police Commissioner, Policy, Resolution
Attachments: 1. 09-0105R - 1st Reader.pdf, 2. Police - 09-0105R.pdf
* WARNING: THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL, INTRODUCTORY COPY OF THE BILL.
THE OFFICIAL COPY CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IS THE FIRST READER COPY.
INTRODUCTORY*

CITY OF BALTIMORE
COUNCIL BILL R
(Resolution)

Introduced by: Councilmembers Young, Holton

A RESOLUTION ENTITLED

A COUNCIL RESOLUTION concerning
Title
Informational Hearing - Baltimore Police Commissioner - Policy Change

FOR the purpose of requesting the Baltimore Police Commissioner to brief the City Council on the change in policy that dictates that the names of police officers who kill or injure citizens will no longer be disclosed to the general public.
Body
Recitals

Early January 2009, Baltimore police officials announced that the names of police officers who kill or injure citizens in the line of duty will no longer be released, changing a long-standing practice that law enforcement personnel reportedly believe puts officers at risk. Further, the new policy is in keeping with some other departments across the country and is designed to protect officers from retaliation, according to a departmental spokesman.

The new policy, while supported by the police union, was met with opposition by some elected officials and community activists as one that did not further a policy of transparent government, facilitate good police/community relations, support the public’s right to know about possible problems with problem officers, or do anything to encourage communities to work with the police to solve crimes and overcome a “Stop-Snitching” culture.

The media reports that many Baltimore area law enforcement agencies report the names of officers involved ...

Click here for full text